The pain you’re solving
- Users want to withdraw to Solana, Polygon, Sonic, Ronin. You’d need a separate integration per chain
- Withdrawal failures generate the highest-volume support tickets
- Onramp users want their fiat to land on the chain where they actually use it
- Your treasury sits on chains you don’t actively operate on
What Eco gives you
| Capability | Product |
|---|---|
| Deterministic EVM address that auto-bridges to Solana | Solana Deposit Addresses |
| Fast gasless deposits into Circle Gateway | Circle Gateway Deposits |
| Cross-chain withdrawal infra without per-chain deployment | Routes API |
| Atomic refunds if a withdrawal fails | Vault model |
Recommended product mix
| Use case | Use |
|---|---|
| Solana withdrawals | Solana Deposit Addresses |
| Gateway-funded withdrawals | Circle Gateway Deposits |
| Withdrawal to any supported EVM chain | Routes API |
| Onramp → end chain in one step | Programmable Addresses |
